Following my previous post about the obsession with details, photography genres require different ways of seeing and representing the subjects that I find hard to adapt to.Thanks for reading I may be wrong!
I love the images, Cedric! So rich... If you ask most street photographers what they prefer, undoubtedly they'll report a devotion to the 35mm or 50mm. For me, I love the 28mm or even wider sometimes and that's because I like the rendering, whether up close and personal with a subject or capturing layers of scenes in one photo. Thanks for the thoughtful set of posts on this subject!
as long as you're willing to do it, it's ok. but if it's not working, don't worry - the f/22 will always be there.
(maybe it will make it easier, maybe not - think about film photography: you loaded the camera with a 200iso film. fine, you can push it if you really want to 800 but that's not always the best. with 200 you are restricted, you can't always have f/16, that might require a tripod which you don't have. so you have to compromise somehow or miss the shot entirely. hmm, all of a sudden, parts is good)
I love the images, Cedric! So rich... If you ask most street photographers what they prefer, undoubtedly they'll report a devotion to the 35mm or 50mm. For me, I love the 28mm or even wider sometimes and that's because I like the rendering, whether up close and personal with a subject or capturing layers of scenes in one photo. Thanks for the thoughtful set of posts on this subject!
Thanks Juliette.
as long as you're willing to do it, it's ok. but if it's not working, don't worry - the f/22 will always be there.
(maybe it will make it easier, maybe not - think about film photography: you loaded the camera with a 200iso film. fine, you can push it if you really want to 800 but that's not always the best. with 200 you are restricted, you can't always have f/16, that might require a tripod which you don't have. so you have to compromise somehow or miss the shot entirely. hmm, all of a sudden, parts is good)